Porous microneedle patch with sustained delivery of extracellular vesicles mitigates severe spinal cord injury

The transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells-derived secretome, particularly extracellular vesicles is a promising therapy to suppress spinal cord injury-triggered neuroinflammation. However, efficient delivery of extracellular vesicles to the injured spinal cord, with minimal damage, remains a challenge. Here we present a device for the delivery of extracellular vesicles to treat spinal cord injury. We show that the device incorporating mesenchymal stem cells and porous microneedles enables the delivery of extracellular vesicles. We demonstrate that topical application to the spinal cord lesion beneath the spinal dura, does not damage the lesion. We evaluate the efficacy of our device in a contusive spinal cord injury model and find that it reduces the cavity and scar tissue formation, promotes angiogenesis, and improves survival of nearby tissues and axons. Importantly, the sustained delivery of extracellular vesicles for at least 7 days results in significant functional recovery. Thus, our device provides an efficient and sustained extracellular vesicles delivery platform for spinal cord injury treatment.

The exact sample size (n) for each experimental group/condition, given as as a discrete number and unit of of measurement A statement on on whether measurements were taken from distinct samples or or whether the same sample was measured repeatedly The statistical test(s) used AND whether they are one-or or two-sided Only common tests should be described solely by name; describe more complex techniques in the Methods section.
A description of of all covariates tested A description of of any assumptions or or corrections, such as as tests of of normality and adjustment for multiple comparisons A full description of of the statistical parameters including central tendency (e.g. means) or or other basic estimates (e.g. regression coefficient) AND variation (e.g. standard deviation) or or associated estimates of of uncertainty (e.g. confidence intervals) For null hypothesis testing, the test statistic (e.g. F, t, r) with confidence intervals, effect sizes, degrees of of freedom and P value noted Give P values as exact values whenever suitable.
For Bayesian analysis, information on on the choice of of priors and Markov chain Monte Carlo settings For hierarchical and complex designs, identification of of the appropriate level for tests and full reporting of of outcomes Estimates of of effect sizes (e.g. Cohen's d, Pearson's r), ), indicating how they were calculated Our web collection on statistics for biologists contains articles on many of the points above.

Software and code
Policy information about availability of of computer code Data collection

Data analysis
For manuscripts utilizing custom algorithms or or software that are central to to the research but not yet described in in published literature, software must be be made available to to editors and reviewers. We We strongly encourage code deposition in in a community repository (e.g. GitHub). See the Nature Portfolio guidelines for submitting code & software for further information.

April 2023
Data Policy information about availability of data All manuscripts must include a data availability statement. This statement should provide the following information, where applicable: -Accession codes, unique identifiers, or web links for publicly available datasets -A description of any restrictions on data availability -For clinical datasets or third party data, please ensure that the statement adheres to our policy Research involving human participants, their data, or biological material Policy information about studies with human participants or human data. See also policy information about sex, gender (identity/presentation), and sexual orientation and race, ethnicity and racism.

Reporting on sex and gender
Reporting on race, ethnicity, or other socially relevant groupings Population characteristics

Recruitment
Ethics oversight Note that full information on the approval of the study protocol must also be provided in the manuscript.

Field-specific reporting
Please select the one below that is the best fit for your research. If you are not sure, read the appropriate sections before making your selection.

Life sciences Behavioural & social sciences Ecological, evolutionary & environmental sciences
For a reference copy of the document with all sections, see nature.com/documents/nr-reporting-summary-flat.pdf

Life sciences study design
All studies must disclose on these points even when the disclosure is negative.
Sample size

Data exclusions
Replication Randomization Blinding All data generated or analysed during this study are available in this published article and its supplementary information files or from the corresponding author.
Use the terms sex (biological attribute) and gender (shaped by social and cultural circumstances) carefully in order to avoid confusing both terms. Indicate if findings apply to only one sex or gender; describe whether sex and gender were considered in study design; whether sex and/or gender was determined based on self-reporting or assigned and methods used. Provide in the source data disaggregated sex and gender data, where this information has been collected, and if consent has been obtained for sharing of individual-level data; provide overall numbers in this Reporting Summary. Please state if this information has not been collected. Report sex-and gender-based analyses where performed, justify reasons for lack of sex-and gender-based analysis.
Please specify the socially constructed or socially relevant categorization variable(s) used in your manuscript and explain why they were used. Please note that such variables should not be used as proxies for other socially constructed/relevant variables (for example, race or ethnicity should not be used as a proxy for socioeconomic status). Provide clear definitions of the relevant terms used, how they were provided (by the participants/respondents, the researchers, or third parties), and the method(s) used to classify people into the different categories (e.g. self-report, census or administrative data, social media data, etc.) Please provide details about how you controlled for confounding variables in your analyses.
Describe the covariate-relevant population characteristics of the human research participants (e.g. age, genotypic information, past and current diagnosis and treatment categories). If you filled out the behavioural & social sciences study design questions and have nothing to add here, write "See above." Describe how participants were recruited. Outline any potential self-selection bias or other biases that may be present and how these are likely to impact results.
Identify the organization(s) that approved the study protocol.
No statistical method was used to determine sample size. The sample sizes for experiments on cells and animals were determined from our previously published investigations ( Ye, J. et al. Rationally Designed, Self-Assembling, Multifunctional Hydrogel Depot Repairs Severe Spinal Cord Injury. Adv Healthc Mater, e2100242 ) and was sufficient to yield statistical significance.

No data was excluded
All experiments were repeated three times as indicated in the figure legends, and the experimental results were reproducible.
For cell-based assays, cultured cells were randomly allocated to different experimental groups. For in vivo experiments, rats were randomly assigned to each experimental group before treatment For in vivo studies, experimenters were blinded to the group allocation. Blinding was performed when conducting quantitative analysis for immunohistochemical, bioluminescence imaging and quantification, in vivo fluorescence quantification and immunofluorescence. Behavior tests (BBB score) were determined from independent persons who were unaware of the expected therapeutic outcome. For in vitro Note that full information on on the approval of of the study protocol must also be be provided in in the manuscript.

Flow Cytometry
Plots Confirm that: The axis labels state the marker and fluorochrome used (e.g. CD4-FITC).
The axis scales are clearly visible. Include numbers along axes only for bottom left plot of of group (a (a 'group' is is an an analysis of of identical markers).
All plots are contour plots with outliers or or pseudocolor plots.
A numerical value for number of of cells or or percentage (with statistics) is is provided.

Methodology
Sample preparation Instrument Software Cell population abundance

Gating strategy
Tick this box to to confirm that a figure exemplifying the gating strategy is is provided in in the Supplementary Information.
All cell lines used in in this study were tested negative for mycoplasma contamination.
No No commonly misidentified cell lines were used